Skip to Main Content
 

IRS Confirms Deductibility of Contributions to Domestic Disregarded Entities

August 3, 2012

On July 31, the IRS announced in Notice 2012-52 that donors may claim charitable deductions for their contributions to domestic disregarded LLCs that are wholly owned and controlled by U.S. charities.  

This guidance provides welcome comfort to donors and the charities they support.  Interestingly, though, the Notice confirms deductibility only for contributions to domestic disregarded LLCs.  The Service remains silent on the issue with respect to disregarded entities organized under foreign law, leaving the treatment of those entities to be determined under the existing regulations.     

Background

The regulations regarding business entity classification under section 7701 of the Code provide that a domestic single-member LLC is presumed to be a disregarded entity unless it makes an affirmative election to be treated separately from its owner.1 Many foreign single-member entities are eligible for the same treatment (though in many cases this requires an affirmative election).2  

The IRS first interpreted these rules in the exempt-organization context in Announcement 99-102, confirming that if the sole member of an LLC is an organization exempt from tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Code, then the activities of the disregarded entity are treated as if conducted through a branch or division of the single owner. Thus, any assets owned or income received by the LLC are treated as if owned or received by the exempt member, and the LLC's finances and operations must be reported on the charity member's annual Form 990.  Similarly, a private foundation's grant to a disregarded, single-member LLC that is wholly owned by a public charity is treated as a grant to the public charity.4  

Effect of the Notice

While prior guidance gave comfort to charities and private foundations, the IRS declined to address the deductibility of individual or corporate gifts to charity-owned LLCs.  The applicable regulations treat disregarded entities (regardless of their country of organization) as their owners  for virtually all federal tax purposes, and seem equally applicable for purposes of section 170 as for other purposes already ruled upon by the Service.However, the Service's refusal to confirm that conclusion had created some uncertainty that hindered charitable planning, particularly with respect to contributions of real property and other assets commonly held through special-purpose limited liability vehicles.  The Notice confirms that the straightforward application of the disregarded entity regulations is correct for domestic disregarded entities—those "created or organized" under U.S. law, as the U.S. parent charities must be to receive deductible contributions. However, it continues the Service's silence on the parallel conclusion for foreign disregarded entities.  This distinction is remarkable because normally the effect of disregarding an entity is to make its parent's foreign or domestic status, rather than its own, controlling for tax purposes. 

For foreign disregarded entities, nothing in Notice 2012-52 alters the Service's position of silence as to whether contributions are deductible under section 170.  Thus, on balance the notice provides good news, providing a helpful additional confirmation of deductibility in the domestic context and leaving the treatment of contributions to foreign disregarded entities to be determined under the existing regulations, as before.  Whether the Service will provide further guidance with respect to contributions to foreign disregarded entities remains to be seen.  

 1 Id. § 301.7701-3(b)(1); see also explanation of default rules in the Instructions to IRS Form 8832, Entity Classification Election.
 2 See Treas. Reg. §§ 301.7701-3(b)(2).
 3 I.R.S. Announcement 99-102, 1999-43 I.R.B. 545 (Oct. 25, 1999).  See also  PLRs 200134025, 200150027, and 200249014 (holding that a single-member LLC owned by a charity  is not required to file a separate exemption application).
 4 Information Letter 2010-52 (March 15, 2010).
 5 See Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-2(c)(2).
 6 Cf., e.g., Treas. Reg. § 1.1441-1(b)(2)(iii)(B).

For more information, please contact any of the following attorneys in our Exempt Organizations practice:

Douglas N. Varley, dvarley@capdale.com, 202.862.7818
William M. Klimon, wklimon@capdale.com, 202.862.5022

________________________________________________

About Caplin & Drysdale
Having celebrated our 50th Anniversary in 2014, Caplin & Drysdale continues to be a leading provider of tax, tax controversy, and litigation legal services to corporations, individuals, and nonprofits throughout the United States and around the world. We are also privileged to serve as legal advisors to accounting firms, financial institutions, law firms, and other professional services organizations.

The firm's reputation over the years has earned us the trust and respect of clients, industry peers, and government agencies. Moreover, clients rely on our broad knowledge of the law and our keen insights into their business concerns and personal interests. Our lawyers' strong tactical and problem-solving skills - combined with substantial experience handling a variety of complex, high stakes, matters in a boutique environment - make us one the nation's most distinctive law firms.

With offices in New York City and Washington, D.C., Caplin & Drysdale's core practice areas include:

-Bankruptcy
-Business, Investment & Transactional Tax
-Complex Litigation
-Corporate Law
-Employee Benefits
-Exempt Organizations
-International Tax
-Political Law
-Private Client
-Tax Controversies
-Tax Litigation
-White Collar Defense

For more information, please visit us at www.caplindrysdale.com.

Washington, DC Office:
One Thomas Circle, NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
202.862.5000
        New York, NY Office:
600 Lexington Avenue
21st Floor 
New York, NY 10022
212.379.6000

___________________________

Disclaimer
This communication does not provide legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship with you or any other reader. If you require legal guidance in any specific situation, you should engage a qualified lawyer for that purpose. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney Advertising
It is possible that under the laws, rules, or regulations of certain jurisdictions, this may be construed as an advertisement or solicitation.

© 2017 Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
All Rights Reserved.